Note: throughout this post, we often omit a factor of ℏ in Hamiltonians. This is done to work with frequencies rather than energies — recall that the units of ℏ are J⋅s.
Two-Level System
Finding the time-dependent wavefunction
For Hamiltonian H^=ωσ^z, we use the time evolution unitary U^=e−iH^t/ℏ to transform our initial state ∣ψ⟩=α∣0⟩+β∣1⟩. Recall that the unitary transformation of any generator operator G^ is
U^=e−iG^t/ℏ
Using the Hamiltonian in this expression creates a phase for both ∣0⟩ and ∣1⟩, introducing time evolution as the transformation to our wavefunction. We evaluate the behavior of the Hamiltonian when applied to the basis:
and thus gives the following expression when inserted into our original state:
∣ψ(t)⟩=αe−iωt/ℏ∣0⟩+βeiωt/ℏ∣1⟩
The Bloch Sphere
We can prove any generic state ∣ψ⟩, up to a global phase, is mappable to a point on the surface of a sphere. Starting from ∣ψ⟩=αeiω1t/ℏ∣0⟩+βeiω2t/ℏ∣1⟩, since only the relative phase has physical meaning, we rewrite as
∣ψ⟩=α∣0⟩+βei(ω2−ω1)t/ℏ∣1⟩
Using α2+β2=1, we reparameterize into the form
∣ψ(t)⟩=cos2θ∣0⟩+sin2θeiϕ∣1⟩,θ∈[0,π],ϕ∈[0,2π)
With this parameterization, we can use θ,ϕ as spherical coordinates with radius 1 to define points on the unit sphere. In Cartesian coordinates:
r=sinθcosϕx^+sinθsinϕy^+cosθz^
Defining α′=αeiω1t/ℏ and β′=βeiω1t/ℏ, we can re-express the Cartesian vector as:
r=2Re(α′∗β′)x^+2Im(α′∗β′)y^+(α′2−β′2)z^
Alternative representation via density matrix. The density matrix of this pure state is
Expanding, setting ωq=ωd, and applying the rotating wave approximation (dropping terms oscillating at 2ωd):
U^H^U^†=2ωqσ^z+21(Ωσ^++Ω∗σ^−)
The second term of the transformation evaluates to
iℏU˙U^†=−ℏ2ωdσ^z
Putting both terms together and canceling the σ^z terms with ωq=ωd:
H˘=21(Ωσ^++Ω∗σ^−)=21(0Ω∗Ω0)
Visualization and Analysis
At ωd=ωq=5.0 GHz, we vary A relative to the timescale t to assess the limits of the RWA. All frequencies are in GHz, all times in ns. The initial state is ∣ψ0⟩=∣0⟩.
The resonant RWA baseline:
Varying A at timescale t=100 ns:
A=0.063,A/ωq=0.0126
A=0.5,A/ωq=0.1
A=1.0,A/ωq=0.2
Varying A at timescale t=50 ns:
A=0.126,A/ωq=0.0252
A=0.3,A/ωq=0.06
A=0.5,A/ωq=0.1
From these plots and mathematical analysis, we draw two conclusions:
To complete a full cycle, A⋅t≈2π. This gives a period of t=A2π.
For the RWA to be valid, A≪ωq. As a general rule, A/ωq≲0.05 yields a good approximation.
Off-Resonant Driving
We now consider ωd=ωq and display the effects of an off-resonant driving field. Using ∣ψ0⟩=∣0⟩, t=100 ns, A=0.063, and ωq=5.0 GHz:
ωd=5.005
ωd=5.01
ωd=5.03
ωd=5.05
ωd=5.07
ωd=4.97
Off-resonant driving shrinks the rotation progressively toward the initial state ∣0⟩. As the drive frequency moves farther from the qubit frequency, the ⟨z⟩ plot approaches 1.00 and the ⟨y⟩ plot approaches 0.00.